Enhancing Language Models to Provide Verified Quote-Based Answers: An SEO-Friendly and Compelling Approach
Introduction:
DeepMind recently published a series of papers on large language models (LLMs), including an analysis of Gopher, their own LLM. Language modelling technology, which is also being developed by other labs and companies, has the potential to enhance various applications, from search engines to conversational assistants. However, a major concern is that LLMs like Gopher can “hallucinate” facts that seem believable but are actually false. To address this issue, DeepMind developed GopherCite, a model that supports its claims with verifiable evidence from the web. By using evidence-based responses, GopherCite aims to make language models more trustworthy for users and evaluators. DeepMind’s paper discusses the development of GopherCite, its training process, and its performance in answering fact-seeking and explanation-seeking questions. While GopherCite is a significant advancement, DeepMind acknowledges that evidence citation is just one aspect of ensuring safety and trustworthiness in LLMs. They will continue to work on this area and explore further research and development.
Full Article: Enhancing Language Models to Provide Verified Quote-Based Answers: An SEO-Friendly and Compelling Approach
DeepMind, a leading artificial intelligence (AI) research organization, has published a series of papers on large language models (LLMs), including an analysis of their own model called Gopher. These language models have the potential to enhance various applications, such as search engines and conversational assistants. However, one of the concerns with these models is that they can generate fake or misleading information. To address this issue, DeepMind has developed GopherCite, a model that backs up its factual claims with evidence from the web. This approach aims to make language models more trustworthy and reliable for users.
Addressing the Problem of Language Model Hallucination
One of the major concerns with language models like Gopher is their tendency to “hallucinate” facts that may appear plausible but are actually fake. This can lead to users believing inaccurate information. In response to this problem, DeepMind has introduced GopherCite, which aims to eliminate language model hallucination. GopherCite leverages Google Search to find relevant web pages and quotes a passage from these pages to support its responses. If the model is unable to provide an answer supported by evidence, it simply responds with “I don’t know” instead of giving an unsubstantiated answer.
The Importance of Verifiable Evidence
By supporting factual claims with verifiable evidence, GopherCite takes a significant step towards enhancing the trustworthiness of language models. This provides reassurance for users interacting with these models and gives annotators a guideline for assessing the quality of model-generated samples. To illustrate the change from “raw” Gopher to GopherCite, DeepMind compares the behavior of both models in their paper.
Training Gopher according to Human Preferences
DeepMind trained GopherCite by incorporating human preferences. Participants in a user study were asked to select their preferred answer from a pair of candidates based on criteria that included the quality of evidence supporting the answers. These user preferences were then used as training data for both supervised learning and reinforcement learning from human preferences (RLHP). DeepMind has employed a similar approach in their previous work on red teaming.
Similar Efforts by Google and OpenAI
DeepMind acknowledges that they are not the only ones working on addressing the problem of factual inaccuracies in language models. Google has made progress in factual grounding with their LaMDA system, where a conversational model interacts with Google Search and provides relevant URLs. OpenAI has also announced their work on a system called WebGPT, which aligns their GPT-3 language model using RLHP and provides evidence-backed responses. While GopherCite and these systems share similarities in methodology, DeepMind’s model focuses on providing specific snippets of evidence rather than solely pointing to URLs.
User Study Results
To evaluate GopherCite’s performance, DeepMind conducted a user study with paid participants. The study included fact-seeking questions from the “NaturalQuestions” dataset released by Google and explanation-seeking questions from the “/r/eli5” forum on Reddit. According to the study, GopherCite answered fact-seeking questions correctly around 80% of the time and provided satisfactory evidence. For explanation-seeking questions, it achieved similar accuracy levels of approximately 67%. GopherCite’s performance improved significantly when it chose to refrain from answering certain questions, as detailed in their paper. DeepMind considers the explicit mechanism for abstaining a core contribution of their work.
Moving Towards Dialogue-Based Models
DeepMind believes that enriching the interaction between language models and users is crucial to avoid failure modes like falling for adversarial questions. They propose a shift from single-shot replies to engaging in dialogue with users to clarify questions and context. For instance, future models could ask users whether they prefer literally true answers or answers that align with the fictional world of a specific advertisement.
Beyond Evidence Citation
DeepMind acknowledges that evidence citation is just a part of a broader strategy for safety and trustworthiness in language models. Not all claims require quoted evidence, and not all claims supported by evidence are true. Some claims may require multiple pieces of evidence and logical arguments. They express their commitment to continue researching and developing solutions in this area, along with dedicated sociotechnical research.
Paper Details and FAQ
For more in-depth information, DeepMind’s paper covers various details about their methods, experiments, and relevant context from the research literature. They have also created an FAQ about GopherCite, where the model itself answers questions after reading the paper’s introduction, using samples curated by the authors.
Conclusion
DeepMind’s introduction of GopherCite represents a significant advancement in addressing the issue of factual inaccuracies in language models. By relying on evidence from the web to support its responses, GopherCite aims to make language models more trustworthy and reliable. However, DeepMind acknowledges that evidence citation alone is not enough, and additional research and development are needed to ensure safety and trustworthiness in language models.
Summary: Enhancing Language Models to Provide Verified Quote-Based Answers: An SEO-Friendly and Compelling Approach
DeepMind recently published a series of papers about large language models (LLMs) and the challenges associated with deploying them in user-facing applications. One particular concern is that LLMs can generate plausible-sounding but false facts. To address this, DeepMind developed GopherCite, a model that backs up its factual claims with evidence from the web. GopherCite uses Google Search to find relevant web pages and quotes a passage to support its answer. Comparisons between GopherCite and the raw Gopher model show the improvement in providing trustworthy and evidence-supported responses. DeepMind’s research contributes to the ongoing efforts in addressing factual inaccuracies in language models.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. What is deep learning and how does it work?
Deep learning is a subset of artificial intelligence that utilizes neural networks to imitate human thought processes. It involves training a neural network model with a large amount of labeled data to recognize patterns, make predictions, or perform tasks. The network consists of multiple layers, allowing it to learn and extract hierarchical representations of data, enabling more accurate results.
2. What are the main applications of deep learning?
Deep learning has found applications in various fields, including computer vision, natural language processing, speech recognition, and recommendation systems. It is used for image and object recognition, sentiment analysis, language translation, autonomous driving, and even drug discovery. Its ability to process and analyze large datasets makes it invaluable in tackling complex problems.
3. What are the advantages of using deep learning?
Deep learning has several advantages over traditional machine learning algorithms. It can automatically learn and extract features from raw data, eliminating the need for manual feature engineering. It can handle complex and high-dimensional datasets and often achieves superior performance. Deep learning models have the ability to generalize well to unseen data, making them robust. Additionally, they can adapt and improve their accuracy with more training data.
4. Are there any limitations or challenges associated with deep learning?
Though powerful, deep learning has certain limitations. It requires large amounts of labeled training data, making data acquisition and annotation expensive and time-consuming. Deep learning models are also computationally intensive and may require high-performance hardware. There is a risk of overfitting with complex models and insufficient training data. Interpreting and understanding how a deep learning model arrives at its decisions, known as the black box problem, can also be challenging.
5. How can I get started with deep learning?
To begin with deep learning, it is essential to have a strong foundation in mathematics, particularly linear algebra and calculus. Familiarize yourself with programming languages commonly used for deep learning, such as Python. You can start by exploring popular deep learning frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch. There are numerous online courses, tutorials, and books available to help you gain knowledge and practical experience. It’s important to experiment with small-scale projects, gradually increasing the complexity as you gain proficiency.
